Thursday, 29 January 2026

The Enforcer Rare Advertisements from Trade Papers


The Enforcer Rare Advertisements from Trade Papers
Here are a couple of extremely rare advertisements for the forthcoming release, The Enforcer (1976). I can’t be 100% sure, but I think these probably materialised from one of the trade papers and probably date from November / December 1976. Whilst the artwork was the same used across the board – the text indicates that these are early examples. Warners really pushed the advertising for this, the third Dirty Harry movie in the series. Both of these ads came from the same publication, devoting a full 2 page spread and, on the reverse, a full single page featuring the one sheet design. The double page spread features the Half sheet ‘windscreen’ design which was also used for the British Quad design. For me, this is still the winner from The Enforcer designs. 
I had to do a bit of restoration work to these scans (particularly the double page spread) as the original pages were just ripped from the publication – they’re not bad and you get the general idea; they needed to be saved regardless. My kind thanks to Davy Triumph for finding these. 

Saturday, 24 January 2026

Play Misty For Me - Music from The Films of Clint Eastwood

Play Misty For Me - Music from The Films of Clint Eastwood
Better late than never, I finally added this collection to the shelf last week. A superb collection of songs from Clint Eastwood's iconic movies! Limited edition 180g blue coloured vinyl - with unique cover artwork, New Continent – 101042. Barcode: 8436569195970
The great Clint Eastwood first started his career as an actor, but later gained further prestige as a director with films such as Unforgiven (1992), for which he won the Academy Awards for Best Director and Best Picture, Bridges of Madison County (1995), and Mystic River (2003), among many others.
Also, as a piano player and composer himself, Eastwood's love for jazz and blues is apparent when listening to the music he chose for the soundtracks of several of his movies. In fact, he used Erroll Garner's celebrated song "Misty" in the first film he directed, titled Play Misty for Me (1971). Presented here is a collection of classic jazz, blues, swing and country performances featured in the soundtrack of some of his films.

Clint Eastwood interview Jazz Times in 2007: "When I was a kid growing up in Oakland, I started listening to a program called The Dixieland Jubilee. For fifteen minutes every day, they'd play the Frisco Jazz Band, Lu Watters' Yerba Buena Jazz Band, stuff like that. Then there was a jazz store out near El Cerrito, and I went out there and started listening to things and purchased a few records. Bop was starting to come in pretty good. So I went over and saw Dizzy Gillespie with a big band in San Francisco. There was a lot of blues being played around Oakland at that time - Ivory Joe Hunter, Joe Houston, Wynonie Harris - and I got wrapped up listening to that.
As far as I can establish, I believe this is a vinyl only release – I have yet to see it on any other format such as Compact Disc. Nice for those of us who still collect vinyl, not so great if you don’t… 
Anyway, there it is. 


Tracklisting
Side 1
1. Errol Garner - Misty (from Play Misty for Me)
2. Dinah Washington - I’ll Close My Eyes (from The Bridges of Madison County)
3. Stan Getz - All the Thing You Are (from The Rookie)
4. Billie Holiday - I’ll Be Seeing You (from J. Edgar)
5. Thelonious Monk - Round Midnight (from Thelonious Monk: Straight No Chaser)
6. Marty Robbins - Don’t Worry (from A Perfect World)
7. Johnny Cash - Folsom Prison Blues (from Escape from Alcatraz)
Side 2
1. Ahmad Jamal - Poinciana (from The Bridges of Madison County)
2. Charlie Parker - Laura (from Bird)
3. Dinah Washington - Blue Gardenia (from The Bridges of Madison County)
4. Perry Como - Catch a Falling Star (from A Perfect World)
5. Johnny Hartman - I See Your Face Before Me (from The Bridges of Madison County)
6. Tony Bennett - I Wanna Be Around (from Midnight in the Garden of Good and Evil)
7. Dean Martin - Ain’t That a Kick in the Head (from White Hunter Black Heart)
8. Frankie Valli & The Four Seasons - Sherry (from Jersey Boys)

 

Saturday, 17 January 2026

Kelly’s Heroes: The argument that refuses to go away


Kelly’s Heroes: The argument that refuses to go away
I was reading a story last year (in July), an old story that seems to have legs and refuses to go away. It concerns the post production of Kelly’s Heroes and the final cut. The whole argument is centred around the film’s original ‘message’ which Eastwood argues was completely lost and instead was turned into a routine wartime comedy heist movie. 
I didn’t post this story in July, but just lately (Jan 2026) there was another story, a follow up by the same writer which was linked to the same story that also appeared on the web. 
So, I’ve decided to post both of these stories here now as I think it is something that still holds a great deal of interest. 
I personally have mixed feelings about it. As an audience we have only been privy to the release cut, we have only ever known it as a straight forward, comedy heist movie - but it’s Eastwood’s argument that leaves us all in a state of wonder and the thought of what might have been? Don’t get me wrong, I actually love Kelly’s Heroes just as it is, imo, it’s a fine piece of entertainment - which I might add, did quite well at the box office. 
How can we, the audience, ever be in a position to compare and contrast any alternative? Eastwood of course, is a different matter - he’s the star and as such is actively involved in the production - so we are only involved by observing and listening to those arguments presented by Eastwood. I think it’s fair to say that we are never going to see an alternative cut of the film. Why would they? The version we have is the version we are only ever going to have. So I guess we have to accept it for what it is - and that’s just fine by me. 
I just hope that Clint doesn't reflect on Kelly’s Heroes with too much regret. The film remains a fan favourite. I just don’t want to see the man openly criticise the movie simply because it fell short of ‘his’ original expectations. As I said, we, the audience, were never privy to any other viewpoint - we simply judge on what we see and what we are presented with. 

The Clint Eastwood movie ruined by studio politics: “They’re going to hate this goddamn film”
Scott Campbell
Thu 10 July 2025
Actors don’t have much say in what happens to a movie once the cameras have stopped rolling and it enters post-production, but Clint Eastwood still tried to state a case for trying to save a film he believed was being ruined by too many grubby fingerprints at studio level.

At the time, he still hadn’t made his directorial debut and hadn’t diversified his input by producing any of his pictures either, meaning there was nothing he could do about it. After all, he was only an actor for hire who was paid to perform their part and leave it at that, not that it prevented him from trying anyway.

He was a big enough star that filmmakers would listen to his suggestions and take some of them on board in the hopes of improving the end product, but Eastwood’s influence didn’t stretch as far as the boardroom, who continually ignored his pleas to maintain the spirit of the story that convinced him to sign on for 1970’s Kelly’s Heroes in the first place.

Director Brian G Wilson’s (? Hutton's) ensemble war dramedy turned a profit at the box office and earned strong reviews, so it’s not as if the movie was butchered. Still, the leading man wanted more from what emerged on the silver screen as a fairly by-the-numbers tale of a ragtag group of soldiers going AWOL to head behind enemy lines during World War II and heist Nazi gold from a French bank.

“This thing had been completely dehumanised,” he ranted to Paul Nelson. “It’d just become a massive action thing in which the special effects were great and there was a lot of action. But there was too much action. There needed to be some reason for this whole caper being there.”

When he asked then-MGM boss Jim Aubrey if a deleted scene could be put back into Kelly’s Heroes, he was told no because a premiere screening had already been arranged. When he asked if the first showing could be delayed so he could work on the edit to make it better, he was also told no, leaving Eastwood increasingly frustrated.

“Forget the critics,” he told Aubrey. “They’re going to hate this goddamn film anyway. Let’s put the movie back in its proper order so at least it has a fair chance, so that the critics might see something, or anybody might see something. The audience, mainly.” Once more, his request was denied.

To make matters worse, MGM was in a constant state of transition. Eastwood explained that Bob O’Brien was the president when he first became attached to Kelly’s Heroes, who was then replaced by Louis F Polk, who was himself usurped by Aubrey, “So it started under one regime and was released two regimes later.”

From his perspective, MGM “needed the dough real fast,” and the best way to do that was to rush the movie into cinemas and ignore his constant petitions to try and improve the film. It wasn’t a disaster by any stretch, but it might well have been vastly superior had Eastwood gotten his way.

The “dumb” movie that left Clint Eastwood “incensed”: “I had no control over that thing” 
Scott Campbell
Sat 10 January 2026
Other than the fact he’d always fancied working on the other side of the camera, one of the main reasons why Clint Eastwood was so keen to develop and direct his own projects was so that he didn’t have to work with idiots anymore. If he called the shots, then there’d be nobody else to blame but him.

He had to bide his time, though, and it wouldn’t be until his 23rd appearance in a feature that he made his directorial debut. Even at that, he’d scratched and clawed for over a decade just to keep his head above water, with Sergio Leone’s Dollars trilogy the catalyst for his ascent to stardom.

Once he’d returned from his international jaunt, producers did what producers do and offered Eastwood every western under the sun. He wasn’t too enthusiastic at the prospect, even if Hang ‘Em High was worth it, but the actor’s desire to subvert his screen persona backfired horrendously when he thought making Paint Your Wagon would be a good idea.

If he wasn’t being offered westerns, then he was being bombarded with action scripts, so he zagged when everyone wanted to zig and agreed to headline Kelly’s Heroes. The 1970 wartime caper isn’t one of his best, and Eastwood wasn’t a happy camper after fighting the production every step of the way.

“They had a thing called Hogan’s Heroes, very popular on television, and so they come out with Kelly’s Heroes, which is a dumb title,” he declared. “I had no control over that thing, not that I have any better taste than anybody else, but I wouldn’t liked (? Would like) to have done that movie with a little more control.”

Unfortunately, he was just an actor for hire, so nobody in a position of power gave a shit what he thought. “It’s an alright picture,” he conceded. “I’m not putting it down, I just think it could have been a very, very good movie with a little something added special. It was one of the best anti-war stories I’ve ever seen, but it was subtle, it was never preachy. But all that was taken out.”

He didn’t like the title, he didn’t like the way the film had been edited, and he thought the studio had butchered Kelly’s Heroes beyond recognition. To make matters worse, MGM was in a state of transition between new owners after suffering financial difficulties, and the new regime wasn’t interested in listening to any of his suggestions for how to improve the end product.

“That’s another thing that got me incensed,” Eastwood acknowledged. “After spending six months on the road and living out of a suitcase in Yugoslavia, which isn’t bad, it’s a pretty country and everything, then you come back and some jerk sells the picture because he’s taken over a studio that’s broke and wants to make a lot of low-budget films.”

Despite his protests, the movie made money at the box office and scored strong reviews. In another saving grace, it was Eastwood’s penultimate film shoot before his career changed forever; after wrapping The Beguiled in mid-1970, the following year was his most definitive yet, with his directorial debut, Play Misty for Me, and Dirty Harry releasing six and a half weeks apart.

For some context, here’s an original review from The New York Times, June 24th, 1970.
The Screen: Hutton's ‘Kelly's Heroes’ Begins Run 
Brian Hutton's “Kelly's Heroes” is a caper movie of fairly straight‐forward aspirations, disguised as a World War II service comedy—of very complicated aspirations indeed. I suspect that the time for service comedies may have passed a while ago (the currency of “M*A*S*H” merely proves the point; a comic iconoclasm so general ly popular must be long since out of date), and the time for caper movies, as anybody who has seen 20 or 50 can testify, never came.

“Kelly's Heroes,” therefore, is not without its problems. But it is very largely without viable solutions to them. Not without resources—it is full of resources, natural and mostly untapped—but without that resourcefulness necessary to persuade us that comedy, any comedy, is worth the time of day.

Set during the Allied advance across France, “Kelly's Heroes” concerns a group of non-coms and private soldiers who learning that the Ger mans have stored gold bullion worth many millions in a town bank not far behind their own front lines (the logic of this escapes me), open up their own little panzer attack in order to steal it. The film divides its attention more or less equally between the logistics of the heist (the sine qua non of caper movies) and the heroics of the mission.

In leading the heroics, Kelly's heroes turn in performances that range from mod relevance (Donald Sutherland) to self‐parody (Clint Eastwood), with samples of stand‐up comedy (Don Rickles) and exasperated expediency (Telly Savalas) in between. Of the principals I liked only Telly Savalas, who builds the first sergeant, a predictable role, into a characterization that would grace a much funnier or more serious movie.
Donald Sutherland, on the other hand, has put together not so much a characterization as a first aid package. A hippie tank driver who has established a commune at the front and who digs beautiful people, etc., he is not only an anachronism by at least 25 years, but also an anachronism whose only purpose is to help this movie make the scene. Deprived of any real context, the ticks and attitudinizing of his performance seem not so much a means of expression as of self-defence.

Clint Eastwood, who is not generally a funny man, plays with a quiet thin‐lipped determination of such withdrawn ferocity—as if he was a kind of Gary Cooper whose essence had not just pre ceded but utterly superseded his existence — that you would expect his goal to be murder rather than money.
The aim is money, but much murder is committed in its pursuit, and something goes not merely dull but terribly wrong with “Kelly's Heroes” along the way. De tailed and impressive in its bomb bursts, demolitions, and other special effects, it is greatly concerned with the pleasures of war. While the tanks advance and buildings crumble and bridges collapse and the dialogue remains at the level of a shouted “All right! Move out!” (as it mostly does), the movie partakes of good clean scary fun.

But when men are killed, and a lot of men are killed, many Germans, a few Americans, the balance alters to the horrors of war. To ac knowledge its deaths the film has no resources above the conventional antagonistic ironies and, comradely pieties of most war movies. And since its subject is not war, but burglary masquerading as war, the easy acceptance of the masquerade—which is apparently quite beyond the film's control—becomes a denial of moral perception that depresses the mind and bewilders the imagination. “Kelly's Heroes” seem big, expensive, loud and innocuous. I don't think it is so innocuous.

It's a story with questions, no doubt about it, personally, I think I like the film just as it is - we live with it despite what hidden issues there might have been. 

Tuesday, 6 January 2026

Was Cinema ever better than 1973…


Was Cinema ever better than 1973…
It was right around this time some 53 years ago that Magnum Force was lighting up many cinema screens around the world. On reflection, Warner Bros arguably produced three of the most remarkable movies of the decade in 1973 – with Magnum Force, The Exorcist and Enter the Dragon in the can, their 50th Anniversary year was certainly going to be a profitable one with all of these movies doing great business throughout 1974. 
Above: Magnum Force at Mann’s Chinese Theatre on Hollywood Boulevard

December 1973 – March 1974 proved to be an incredible few opening months of the year. Magnum Force kicked it all off with a Gala showing at Mann’s Chinese Theatre on Hollywood Boulevard. Originally Grauman's Chinese Theatre, it was originally built by showman Sid Grauman then the name was changed after the theatre chain was acquired by Ted Mann in 1973. 



What’s fascinating about the Magnum Force special preview premier (at Mann’s Chinese Theatre) on December 25th, 1973, is the fact that this wasn’t actually the world premier! It was actually in London where it received its premiere, at the Warner West End - a little earlier on December 13th, 1973, and before it’s wider international release. 

Left: A rare advertisement for the Sneak Preview at Mann's Chinese Theatre

Below: 2 rare advertisements for the London World Premier West End screenings - almost 2 weeks earlier


On January 10th 1974, Warner’s Kung Fu epic Enter the Dragon unleashed Bruce Lee on the scene while most of the world was still mourning his death on July 20th 1973. The temptation to pair up both Lee and Eastwood and their 2 latest smash hits proved irresistible. This would not be the last time, The Way of the Dragon was also paired as a double bill with Thunderbolt and Lightfoot in subsequent re-releases, such as in the United Kingdom around 1975.

To conclude these brief few months of 1974 was of course The Exorcist. The Exorcist premiered in London on March 14, 1974, with its premiere screening taking place at the Warner Leicester Square.
The film had a limited release in five West End cinemas initially before being more widely released later that year. Its initial run was highly publicised due to the extreme audience reactions, with reports of people fainting and becoming physically sick during screenings. Ha, love the hype – love the period – did cinema ever get any better I wonder? 
Above: The Exorcist at the Warner, West End

Thursday, 1 January 2026

Photo Opportunity #69 OK Sergio – make us famous…


Photo Opportunity #69 OK Sergio – make us famous… 
To start off the new month of the New year, I thought I’d go with this absolute corker of a shot which features Sergio Leone directing Clint in a scene from A Fistful of Dollars (1964). This is probably around April or May 1964 as this was an interior shot filmed at Cinecittà Studios in Rome.  The entire movie was filmed over a period of 11 weeks, with the production later moving to Spain to shoot the exterior scenes in the Tabernas Desert and near Madrid.
While Sergio is giving direction, Eastwood's character, (Joe), is seen here recovering from the brutal beating in A Fistful of Dollars by escaping and hiding out in an abandoned mine. The beating was not originally cut from the film itself, but it was heavily censored in certain international theatrical releases, notably the original British version. The original British Board of Film Censors (BBFC) theatrical release had about 4 minutes cut, which heavily reduced the beating scene, removing a specific shot of a hand-stomping, as well as several close-ups of bloodied faces.
My kind thanks to Davy Triumph for unearthing this gem of a shot – and for generally being the best No 2 to I could wish for here. 
Happy New Year Everyone

Wednesday, 24 December 2025

White Hunter, Black Heart arrives on Spanish Blu-ray


White Hunter, Black Heart arrives on Spanish Blu-ray
Well, it’s been a long wait, I believe the official date for this release was November 5th , it’s a crying shame that the United States and the United Kingdom have both chosen to ignore this film, but I’ve given up trying to figure out the studios and their mentality – but hey, it just dropped through my door on Christmas Eve – so I’ll be projecting this tonight. To support this release, I thought I’d post this piece by Brogan Morris which appeared on the BFI website on Aug 30th 2020.
Clint’s best shot: White Hunter Black Heart and Eastwood’s biggest performance. 

20 (35) years after White Hunter Black Heart’s failure at the box office, Clint Eastwood’s larger-than-life performance as a megalomaniac John Huston-like film director looks like his boldest turn, says Brogan Morris.

Clint Eastwood was in a transitional phase when he made White Hunter Black Heart. In the year prior to shooting the film, his 14th as director, he completed his stint as mayor of California’s Carmel-by-the-Sea, starred in his last Dirty Harry picture The Dead Pool (1988) and ended a 14-year relationship with partner and regular collaborator Sondra Locke, having recently secretly fathered two children through an affair. 

In the summer of 1989, when cameras rolled, Clint was locked in an ugly palimony battle and approaching 60. The film would unsurprisingly find him in a reflective mood. 

Based on author and Hollywood screenwriter Peter Viertel’s lightly fictionalised account of the unruly making of The African Queen, director John Huston’s 1951 romantic Technicolor odyssey, White Hunter Black Heart follows Viertel’s pseudonymous script doctor Pete Verrill (Jeff Fahey) to Central Africa, where an ageing filmmaker means to shoot his latest picture but instead becomes obsessed with shooting an elephant. 

Rechristened John Wilson, Huston is here portrayed in all his urbane, boorish, self-loathing, egomaniacal glory; and though the film is directed with Eastwood’s preferred unshowy formalism, his performance at the centre as Wilson is a uniquely bold one for the actor.


While as a filmmaker Eastwood has proven adventurous, trying his hand at everything from romance to fantasy to musicals (and with a Japanese-language war epic thrown in for good measure), Eastwood the performer has been considerably less so. Across a 65-year acting career, Clint has tended to play variations on the same super-capable, taciturn antihero, with the signature squinted glare, clenched jaw and whispery line delivery familiar to almost every one of his characters. 
Such immutability once prompted critic Pauline Kael to write: “He isn’t an actor, so one could hardly call him a bad actor. He’d have to do something before we could consider him bad at it.”
Considering what he told the LA Times in 1990 regarding his obviously studied performance in White Hunter – “I may have gone way over the wall, I may have gone too far. But I didn’t want to be too careful and wind up not doing anything” – John Wilson could be considered Eastwood’s response to such criticisms.

Approximating the debonair Huston’s theatrical mannerisms and musically affected drawl, here Eastwood – normally so still and tight-lipped – is animated and verbose. Wilson pontificates; he offers unsolicited wisdom (“To write a movie you must forget that anyone’s ever going to see it”) and seeks to antagonise anyone around him considered to be weak in character.
Apparently relishing embodying someone so unlike himself – and, perhaps, enjoying the chance to subvert the classic Eastwood ‘type’ – in this film Clint doesn’t play scenes so much as blow his way through them cigarillo-first.
In what could be read as a critique of behaviour that came so naturally to the virile gunslingers he was known for playing in the first half of his career, Eastwood allows himself to appear unheroic, even ridiculous as John Wilson. Wilson can’t shoot worth a damn, despite his passion for hunting big game; can seemingly only get women into bed by luring them there with dreams of Hollywood; and gets beaten in fights. In one scene, he unwisely challenges a white African bar manager to fisticuffs ostensibly to defend the honour of a humiliated black waiter. However, like his desire to drink and smoke the most and kill the biggest animal, the challenge is really just part of the director’s ongoing effort to cultivate a macho reputation. 

With a lifetime of devil-may-care living showing in Wilson’s failing health (in real-life, Huston was in the early stages of emphysema while filming The African Queen), in this film the Eastwood character’s masculinity is shown to be only destructive, and increasingly so as he creeps closer to old age.
This apparent rejection by Eastwood of his own iconic persona wasn’t a popular move back in 1990. Whereas Eastwood’s best-loved roles create myths, White Hunter Black Heart set about deconstructing them – Wilson/Huston’s, as well as Eastwood’s own – while a character study of a complicated cinephiles’ favourite understandably held limited appeal for standard Eastwood fans.
It became one of Clint’s biggest flops, the $24m film grossing just $2m on release. Meanwhile, contemporary critics generally considered the leading man’s performance to be a failure. In an otherwise positive review for Sight & Sound, Richard Combs wrote that Eastwood was “uncomfortable playing this kind of imposter”.
30 years on, Eastwood’s biggest swing as an actor is fascinating. Two years after White Hunter got its muted reception, the similarly introspective Unforgiven would see Eastwood reassume his crowd-pleasing gunslinger persona (albeit with a wearier edge than Dirty Harry or the Man with No Name ever knew) to great fanfare. There would be no further displays of full-throated character acting from Clint, meaning only in White Hunter Black Heart has he ever truly risked departure from the ‘Eastwood type’. 
But though critics at the time thought Eastwood out of his depth playing a John Huston proxy, today John Wilson looks like one of his more intelligent portrayals.
The Wilson character may be oversized (though so was Huston), but he’s played by Eastwood as a man giving a performance, the forceful charisma masking whatever uncertainty lies beneath. At a turbulent time in his life, and while making the transition from middle- to old-age, and from action star to a director of quiet, sombre art, Eastwood played a character reckoning with himself. 
“Do you understand me?”, Wilson asks Verrill in one scene. “Of course you don’t – how could you? I don’t understand myself.” Not before or since would audiences see this monolith of big screen masculinity so exposed.  - Brogan Morris (2020)

In conclusion:
So is White Hunter, Black Heart a misunderstood movie? Would today’s audience find it more accepting? I’d like to think so, White Hunter, Black Heart is often considered a much-underrated film, praised retrospectively for its complex critique of American arrogance, imperialism, and flawed masculinity, rather than just a simple adventure or a portrait of a macho director, with critics highlighting its subtle ambiguity and Eastwood's layered performance as an unheroic figure. It delves into the psyche of artist-explorers like John Huston (the real-life inspiration), challenging typical Eastwood heroism by showing his character's self-destructive obsession and moral failings.

I’ve included an Interview below with the late Barry Norman from his long running BBC Film series - my thanks to the original uploader.
              

Tuesday, 16 December 2025

Dirty Harry / Magnum Force 1975 Double-Bill release – Celebrating 50 Years!

Dirty Harry / Magnum Force 1975 Double-Bill release – Celebrating 50 Years! 
It was only when I was restoring an old Warner Bros ad this morning when I realised that this great pairing from 1975 was in fact 50 years ago! It’s incredible how the time flies. So considering how we are just a week or so away from Christmas I thought I’d gather some of the double Bill stuff together and post it here while there was still a little of 2025 left. 

Warner Brothers actually made rather a big deal out of these 2 movies, and gave the Double Bill quite an extensive promotional campaign. The programme was actually launched on both sides of the Atlantic running in both the U.S. and the U.K. In America it was tagged as ‘Double Trouble’ and did incredibly well at the Box Office. It was a summer release, and it appeared that the public couldn’t get enough of their favourite cop. 
Eastwood was right in the middle of making his permanent move from Universal to Warner Brothers, so giving these 2 big hitters another run probably proved a lucrative move for Warner Bros, plus of course the perfect piece of advance publicity for the up-and-coming production and third Dirty Harry outing, The Enforcer (1976). The Enforcer would be ready for general release in the December of 1976 both in the U.S. and U.K. 

It's a pity no-one came up with double bill set of Lobby cards to support this release – especially as there was a nice poster campaign. I can’t help thinking that was a bit of a lost opportunity. 
Below: The U.S. Pressbook
Below: Word first came about when this funky double page ad appeared in the Variety Trade paper. The double-Bill appeared alongside Gene Hackman’s latest; Night Moves and the George Pal adventure movie, Doc Savage. Paul Newman’s latest The Drowning Pool, a sequel to Harper (UK The Moving Target) was also featured in the spread. 
In America a full One Sheet poster and Half Sheet poster were produced providing us with a mirror image of Harry Callahan and two protruding 44 Magnum barrels – an imposing image that couldn’t fail to draw attention. The was also a U.S. pressbook which helped (if it were ever needed) to push the action to the cinema chains and press.  
Below: The U.S. One Sheet 
Below: The U.S. Half Sheet
In the UK we were treated to a nice full Quad poster and an attractive Double Crown. What’s interesting in all these posters is the lack of any coloured imagery. All of the formats used stark, previously used artwork all of which was in b/w. Whilst the U.S. campaign used a photo image (from Magnum Force) – the U.K. marketing used bold artwork which was a simple reworking of the individual quad designs – all with a strong red border which looked effective and memorable. 
There are still plenty of examples of these posters on the markets all of which still fetch quite a price. That said, don’t expect to see too many of the rare U.K. Double Crown – they are very scarce indeed and you can expect to pay a hefty premium price if and when one should surface. 
Below: The UK Quad Posters including the Rare text only version
Below: A very rare example of the UK Double Crown poster
Below: Some incredibly Rare Original Newspaper ads for the Double-Bill and look to be from Australia